TransUnion VantageScore Credit Score and What’re Different from FICO Score
Post viewed 2903 times, 9 so far today
Every January, May, and September is free credit report time for us and we have been getting one credit report for free every four months from one of the three credit bureaus for many years, well before the law that made everybody eligible for a free report every calendar year. On January 3, I requested our annual reports from TransUnion, but this time I also ordered an extra item, a credit score, a VantageScore credit score to be exact.
Though I have purchased FICO credit score several times in the past, I always buy it through myFICO because FICO score is the standard that is widely used by lenders. Prior to January 3, I didn’t even know there exists a competitor called VantageScore, despite the *new* product has been around for more than a year
Anyway, I didn’t cancel my order after being told that I will get VantageScore instead of FICO score. I wanted to see how the new score looks like. And here it is.

I was quite shocked to see my score at 916 because I usually get 700 something from FICO, then I realized that VantageScore uses a different score range than FICO’s which is normally between 300 and 850. If converted to the 300 to 850 range, my 916 score will be equivalent to 789, almost identical to the last FICO score I got in August. For VantageScore, whose score range is from 501 to 990, in addition to the score, it also assigns a grade:
- “A” credit: 901-990
- “B” credit: 801-900
- “C” credit: 701-800
- “D” credit: 601-700
- “F” credit: 501-600
Since this is the first time that I used VantageScore, I did a little research to get some background information on what exactly it is and how it is different from FICO score.
What’s VantageScore
According to Wikipedia, VantageScore was created by the three leading credit bureaus, Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion, to compete with FICO score, the dominant player in the credit score business. VantageScore was launched on March 16, 2006 and currently is offered by the three agencies. From VantageScore’s website, its features also include:
- Predicts the likelihood of future serious delinquencies (90 days late or greater) on any type of account;
- Consumer score is based primarily on a 24-month review of a consumer’s credit file;
- Includes up to four score factor codes and a fifth FACTA reason code;
- Can be accessed from all three CRCs;
- Does not consider “authorized-user” tradelines to assess credit risk.
The last feature, regarding authorized users, will actually be implemented in the latest update of FICO score formula.
Differences between VantageScore and FICO score
As a competitor to FICO score, VantageScore promises to offer “a highly predictive score with a consistent interpretation of consumer credit files across all three major credit reporting companies.” In addition to the 501 to 990 score range and 5 credit grades, VantageScore also takes a different approach in calculating credit score. According an article on Bankrate.com, VantageScore considers six factors, one more than FICO score:

From what I can see, VantageScore’s Utilization plus Balance is equivalent to FICO’s Amount owed and Types of credit uses, Depth of credit is similar to Length of credit history, and Recent credit is new credit. The only item that’s *new* is Available credit, but can’t it be part of Utilization?
What’s negative with VantageScore
As part of the credit score, VantageScore also listed what it considered as negative factors of my credit score:
- The sum of your bank credit card account balances is too high: High credit balances may be considered by lenders to be a negative factor when determining creditworthiness. Paying down your balance may improve your score.
- The amount paid on your open real estate accounts is too low: Having little paid down on some accounts may be considered by lenders to be a negative factor when determining creditworthiness.
- Your average credit amount on open real estate accounts is too low: Having credit available to you is a sign that you are able to manage your finances responsibly. Lenders usually like to see that consumers have a large amount of credit available to them.
- The balances on your open accounts are too high in comparison to their credit limits: It is a good idea to use your accounts regularly, but remember to keep your balances low in comparison to your available credit limits. Having a high ratio of balances to credit limits on open accounts may be viewed negatively by lenders.
They are quite different from those negative factors on FICO credit score reports, especially the two items related to “real estate account.” Honestly, I don’t really understand what “average credit amount on open real estate accounts” really means. If I am 5 years into a 30-year mortgage, the credit amount could still be low compared to the loan amount, though I have made on-time monthly payment from day one. Does that mean I am less “able to manage your finances responsibly”? I don’t think so!
If you enjoyed reading this post, please consider subscribing to my full RSS feed (What's RSS feed?). Or you can also choose to have free daily updates delivered right to your inbox.
Featured Financial Products
- Ready to buy stocks/ETFs with zero commission? Check out the Zecco review and try Zecco Trading to get 10 free trades/month.
- Seeking higher returns for your cash? Take a look at the latest interest rates from leading online banks and find out where to get the most for your money.
Related Articles You Don't Want To Miss
- TransUnion Settlement to Let You Get Free Credit Score
- myFICO 20% off Summer Sale on All 3 Credit Scores
- Factors Affect Credit Score Negatively
- Authorized Users Will Be Allowed in FICO Score Calculation
- Changes are Coming to Fair Isaac’s FICO Credit Score Calculation
Trackbacks & Pingbacks
- Pingback by Friday Finance Findings For January 11th : Generation X Finance on January 11, 2008 @ 9:05 pm
- Pingback by Health Insurance Companies Suck - Personal Finance Review » Money Smart Life on January 13, 2008 @ 11:36 pm
- Pingback by » TransUnion VantageScore Credit Score and What’s Different from … on January 20, 2008 @ 1:22 pm
- Pingback by Information Web Net » Blog Archive » TransUnion VantageScore Credit Score and What’s Different from … on January 31, 2008 @ 10:08 pm
- Pingback by TransUnion Settlement to Let You Get Free Credit Score on May 31, 2008 @ 11:41 am
7 Comments
Share Your Thouhgts
Your opinion matters. Please use the form below to share your thoughts on TransUnion VantageScore Credit Score and What’re Different from FICO Score with us.Recent Entries
- Why Doesn’t My Credit Score Increase When I Pay My Bills on Time?
- Tasty Hot Pot
- Is Gold a Good Choice to Hedge against Inflation?
- Ebates $10 Referral Bonus
- TradeKing Promotion: Get $50 Bonus in October
- What Zecco Has Done to Improve Their Service: An Interview with Zecco Trading
- Dow Jones Posts Largest Point Drop Ever
- Washington Mutual’s Failure Hurts Some Mutual Fund Investors
- Zecco Gives Unlimited Free Trades in October
- I Lost $250 on WaMu
- Another Historical Moment
- The Market is Plummeting? – No Worries
- A Long Day Yesterday
- Going on Vacation
- WaMu Online Savings Account Now 4.00% APY
- Keep My Money Safe and Let It Grow
- Weekend Linkage - September 21, 2008
- Chinese Stocks Surged as Government Came to Rescue
- U.S. Treasury to Guarantee Money-Market Funds
- Money-Market Funds May not Be As Safe As You Think
- TradeKing Uses Delayed Quote?
- Gold Saw Biggest Jump in History
- Went Fishing, at the Bottom
- AIG Failed, Taken Over By Fed
- HSBC Direct Rolled Back Rate to 3.25% APY After Promotion





I might be wrong, but when I seen your FICO converted score of 789 from your VS score of 916, something didn’t seem right because I had a VS of 937, yet only a 782 FICO. If you look at a score of 916 in a range of 501 to 990, that puts you at the 85th percentile. Translating that to the FICO range of 300 to 850, that would convert to about 768. When I used that same approach for my VS 937(89th percentile), I got a 789, reasonably close to my equifax FICO score of 782. So all in all, perhaps 20 points isn’t significant. But hey, I’m an engineer, I can’t help it. Besides, you asked what 2+2 equals! It’s always been 4 to me, but unfortunately to some, it equals 96, thanks to the greed of the dot com era(which ended in dot-bomb!), and the sub-prime meltdown with NINJNA loans (no income, no job, no assests) persuading people thinking they can afford a half-million dollar home and cash out the equity to boot when the value will suredly increase(in a bubble market - NOT!). It was refreshing to see that you’re striving for 20% down on your next home - best of luck.
Yeah, by converting your Vantage Score to a FICO score, you should have a FICO of 767. If your FICO is 789 then your Vantage score should be 935.76. The Vantage score gives you a loss of about 4.04.%
I have done my own which is a 887 Vantage Score which converts to a FICO of 734. However, I know that my FICO is 789, meaning my Vantage Score should be 935!!. This gives me a loss off my FICO score of almost 10%!!!!
I have seen tons of posts online. IN NOT ONE CASE has anyone’s Vantage Score been an increase over their FICO score after doing out the math. THIS MEANS EVERYONE GETS SCREWED!!!!!!!
I know this system is supposed to rate differently, but it is rating more critical of EVERYONE I have seen posting their scores!! This means higher interest rates for everyone in a already receding economy!!
Isn’t this criminal?!?!?!?