<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Get Up to $100 When Switching to Scottrade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/investing/get-up-to-100-when-switching-to-scottrade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/investing/get-up-to-100-when-switching-to-scottrade/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:09:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Scottrade&#8217;s Customer Service</title>
		<link>http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/investing/get-up-to-100-when-switching-to-scottrade/comment-page-1/#comment-60675</link>
		<dc:creator>Scottrade&#8217;s Customer Service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/investing/brokerage/get-up-to-100-when-switching-to-scottrade/#comment-60675</guid>
		<description>[...] accounts with other firms in the past couple of years, Scottrade remains our primary broker for reasons I have explained before. I am quite happy with Scottrade, though its commission wasn&#8217;t the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] accounts with other firms in the past couple of years, Scottrade remains our primary broker for reasons I have explained before. I am quite happy with Scottrade, though its commission wasn&#8217;t the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scottrade&#8217;s Customer Service &#124; The Suns Financial Diary &#124; A Personal Finance Blog on Saving and Investing</title>
		<link>http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/investing/get-up-to-100-when-switching-to-scottrade/comment-page-1/#comment-41637</link>
		<dc:creator>Scottrade&#8217;s Customer Service &#124; The Suns Financial Diary &#124; A Personal Finance Blog on Saving and Investing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 01:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/investing/brokerage/get-up-to-100-when-switching-to-scottrade/#comment-41637</guid>
		<description>[...] accounts with other firms in the past couple of years, Scottrade remains our primary broker for reasons I have explained before. I am quite happy with Scottrade, though its commission wasn&#8217;t the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] accounts with other firms in the past couple of years, Scottrade remains our primary broker for reasons I have explained before. I am quite happy with Scottrade, though its commission wasn&#8217;t the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yan</title>
		<link>http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/investing/get-up-to-100-when-switching-to-scottrade/comment-page-1/#comment-25600</link>
		<dc:creator>Yan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 07:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/investing/brokerage/get-up-to-100-when-switching-to-scottrade/#comment-25600</guid>
		<description>An account transfer out fee? How usual is this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An account transfer out fee? How usual is this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/investing/get-up-to-100-when-switching-to-scottrade/comment-page-1/#comment-25266</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 08:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/investing/brokerage/get-up-to-100-when-switching-to-scottrade/#comment-25266</guid>
		<description>I think Scottrade&#039;s most unique feature is their huge branch network.  While everyone else is going online-only, there you can still meet face-to-face.  My old office even validated my parking in downtown if I wanted to drop off a check in person.

Unfortunately, in the end that keep their cost structure higher, and $7 a trade doesn&#039;t sound nearly as appealing as it used to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Scottrade&#8217;s most unique feature is their huge branch network.  While everyone else is going online-only, there you can still meet face-to-face.  My old office even validated my parking in downtown if I wanted to drop off a check in person.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, in the end that keep their cost structure higher, and $7 a trade doesn&#8217;t sound nearly as appealing as it used to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/investing/get-up-to-100-when-switching-to-scottrade/comment-page-1/#comment-25205</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/investing/brokerage/get-up-to-100-when-switching-to-scottrade/#comment-25205</guid>
		<description>I too have been a Scottrade customer for a number of years and while I think they are one of the best brokerages out there, the lack of dividend reinvestment REALLY irritates me. In my opinion, they are the best of the bunch, but if they could just get around to implementing dividend reinvestment, they&#039;d be an absolute dream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too have been a Scottrade customer for a number of years and while I think they are one of the best brokerages out there, the lack of dividend reinvestment REALLY irritates me. In my opinion, they are the best of the bunch, but if they could just get around to implementing dividend reinvestment, they&#8217;d be an absolute dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.463 seconds -->
