Determining the Mix of Stocks and Bonds in Your Portfolio
Post viewed 775 times, 5 so far today
Early this month, there’s an article on Morningstar.com discussing the allocation of stocks and bonds in an investment portfolio. Determining the right mix of stocks and bonds depends on many factors, such as age, risk tolerance, and return expectation. For aggressive investors with longer time horizon, they can afford to put a large port of their investments in equities, if not 100%, to seek higher return and growth at the early stage of investing. As time goes by, the focus of investments changes from growing money to preserving capital and, accordingly, investment strategy becomes more conservative.
But what is the right mix of stocks and bonds? If you don’t know how to determine your own stocks/bonds allocation, you may get some clue from the target date funds (or lifecycle funds), which adjust the allocations for investors as the target date approaches. The following is a table of equity allocations in some target date funds from 2005 to 2045 in the Morningstar article.
| Target date | Avg. Equity (%) | High (%) | Low (%) |
| 2005 | 48 | 59 | 43 |
| 2015 | 67 | 84 | 46 |
| 2025 | 79 | 97 | 61 |
| 2035 | 86 | 99 | 60 |
| 2045 | 88 | 99 | 60 |
However, as it shows in the table, even for funds with the same target date, the difference between the highest and lowest allocations is quite substantial (a 39% gap for 2035 and 2045 funds), reflecting each fund manager’s view on the balance between risk and reward. In fact, when I looked at some target date funds from Vanguard, Fidelity, and T. R. Price early this year, I got the conclusion that not every lifecycle fund is created equally, though in that case, the difference is not as large in the Morningstar article.
Though Treasury bonds are regarded as safe heaven when the market is volatile (like the one we are experiencing now), holding too much cash/bonds on hands can do more harm than good for the long term as it will hamper investors’ efforts to reach to reach their financial goals. The long term return of bonds is much lower than that of equities. To me, it really doesn’t make too much sense to have some 30-40% in bonds when I have some 30 years before I use the money. Generally, as pointed out in the article:
investors in their 20s and 30s can glean that they should have upward of 80% of their assets in stocks and stock funds, and even those already in retirement should consider devoting a healthy portion of their portfolio to equities.
If you enjoyed reading this post, please consider subscribing to my full RSS feed (What's RSS feed?). Or you can also choose to have free daily updates delivered right to your inbox.
Featured Financial Products
- Earn up to 5% cash back from these cash back credit cards while shopping at gas stations, grocery stores, or online.
- Buy stocks at TradeKing at a flat $4.95 commission per trade. Check out the TradeKing review and use these TradeKing promotion codes to open an account.
Related Posts
- Creating a Virtual All-EFT Portfolio
- How to Keep More — The Tax Factor in Your Asset Allocation
- myPlan, Fidelity’s Retirement Calculator, Said We Need $6 Million for Retirement
- Weather the Stormy Market with a (Re)Balanced Portfolio
- A Look at Lifecycle Funds from Vanguard, Fidelity, and T. R. Price
Trackbacks & Pingbacks
- Pingback by Friday Finance Findings for November 30th : Generation X Finance on November 30, 2007 @ 11:39 am
- Pingback by How Would I Invest if I Were Just Starting Out? — benway.net on December 15, 2007 @ 11:56 pm
3 Comments
Share Your Thouhgts
Your opinion matters. Please use the form below to share your thoughts on Determining the Mix of Stocks and Bonds in Your Portfolio with us.Recent Entries
- FDIC Problem Banks List Grew to 117 Last Quarter
- DollarSavingsDirect: A High Yield Version of Emigrant Direct
- Financial Tips for College Students
- WTDirect Terminates Promotion After Only Three Days
- Did You Miss These Freebies?
- Google Beijing Olympic Logos: How Google Celebrated the Event
- WaMu Promotion: 5.00% APY for 12-Month Online CD
- WTDirect Promotion: Up to $250 Sign-On Bonus
- American Eagle Gold Coin in Short Supply?
- Boy, Was I Wrong on FRE
- Avoid These Unhealthy Kid Foods
- Suze Orman FICO Kit 20% off Sale
- Poll: Do You Save in 401(k) Without Company Match?
- Weekend Linkage - August 17, 2008
- It’s Not Easy to Live in New Jersey
- Discover More Card $50 Bonus Promotion
- Past Performance of My All-ETF Portfolio and A Little Modification
- Creating a Virtual All-EFT Portfolio
- Weekend Linkage - August 10, 2008
- IGoChecking Gives $50 Gas Cards for New Accounts
- The Wait Is Over. Let’s Party!!!
- 401(k) Debit Card Is NOT a Good Idea
- Firstrade Referral Bonus Sharing Program
- Chinese ADRs Monthly Update - July 2008
- 10 Hottest Mutual Funds in 2008




Important post as approximately 70% of an investors return is dictated by the asset allocation that is selected. Going aggressive does not necessarily mean higher returns - the important thing is to pick an allocation and stick to it long term.