<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Riskier Business: Bonds or Stocks?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/investing/riskier-business-bonds-or-stocks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/investing/riskier-business-bonds-or-stocks/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:14:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: 2007 March 23 : Generation X Finance</title>
		<link>http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/investing/riskier-business-bonds-or-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-4806</link>
		<dc:creator>2007 March 23 : Generation X Finance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/2007/03/16/riskier-business-bonds-or-stocks/#comment-4806</guid>
		<description>[...] Riskier Business: Bonds or Stocks? - We commonly think bonds are relatively low-risk, but are they? The Sun examines the data. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Riskier Business: Bonds or Stocks? &#8211; We commonly think bonds are relatively low-risk, but are they? The Sun examines the data. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan C</title>
		<link>http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/investing/riskier-business-bonds-or-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-4582</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/2007/03/16/riskier-business-bonds-or-stocks/#comment-4582</guid>
		<description>Here-here.

Jeremy Siegel&#039;s book, &quot;Stocks for the Long Run&quot;, makes an authoritative case for stocks as the investment of choice for medium and long-term investing.  The stock market has both the highest historical real return and lowest risk (standard deviation) over long periods of time than bonds/T-bills.

Siegels&#039; study includes a worst-case analysis, including buying at the peak of a bull, and still shows conclusively the historic resiliency of stocks as the least risky inflation-fighting vehicles over the long term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here-here.</p>
<p>Jeremy Siegel&#8217;s book, &#8220;Stocks for the Long Run&#8221;, makes an authoritative case for stocks as the investment of choice for medium and long-term investing.  The stock market has both the highest historical real return and lowest risk (standard deviation) over long periods of time than bonds/T-bills.</p>
<p>Siegels&#8217; study includes a worst-case analysis, including buying at the peak of a bull, and still shows conclusively the historic resiliency of stocks as the least risky inflation-fighting vehicles over the long term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.449 seconds -->
