<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vanguard and Oakmark Reopen Good Funds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/investing/vanguard-and-oakmark-reopen-good-funds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/investing/vanguard-and-oakmark-reopen-good-funds/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:09:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Fidelity to Reopen Contrafund and Low–Priced Stock Fund</title>
		<link>http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/investing/vanguard-and-oakmark-reopen-good-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-50072</link>
		<dc:creator>Fidelity to Reopen Contrafund and Low–Priced Stock Fund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/?p=3069#comment-50072</guid>
		<description>[...] recently is to reopen the funds to new investors. We have already seen good mutual funds from Vangard, Oakmark, and Dodge &amp; Cox reopened their doors. Now Fidelity also put two of its largest funds, Fidelity [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently is to reopen the funds to new investors. We have already seen good mutual funds from Vangard, Oakmark, and Dodge &amp; Cox reopened their doors. Now Fidelity also put two of its largest funds, Fidelity [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conspirama</title>
		<link>http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/investing/vanguard-and-oakmark-reopen-good-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-46357</link>
		<dc:creator>Conspirama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 20:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/?p=3069#comment-46357</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Vanguard and Oakmark Reopen Good Funds...&lt;/strong&gt;

2008 is shaping up to be a very bad year for precious metal funds and funds like VGPMX and  TGLDX are suffering huge losses. So far VGPMX has lost 64% of its value, compared to TGLDX’s 55%. Is it a good time to load up precious metal ......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Vanguard and Oakmark Reopen Good Funds&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>2008 is shaping up to be a very bad year for precious metal funds and funds like VGPMX and  TGLDX are suffering huge losses. So far VGPMX has lost 64% of its value, compared to TGLDX’s 55%. Is it a good time to load up precious metal &#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sun</title>
		<link>http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/investing/vanguard-and-oakmark-reopen-good-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-46351</link>
		<dc:creator>Sun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/?p=3069#comment-46351</guid>
		<description>Andrew: Thanks for the correction. You are right, VINEX does need $25,000 minimum. I guess then this fund is out of the question for many investors because of the high minimum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew: Thanks for the correction. You are right, VINEX does need $25,000 minimum. I guess then this fund is out of the question for many investors because of the high minimum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/investing/vanguard-and-oakmark-reopen-good-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-46348</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/?p=3069#comment-46348</guid>
		<description>Looks like the newly reopened VINEX has a minimum of $25,000, not $3,500.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the newly reopened VINEX has a minimum of $25,000, not $3,500.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.386 seconds -->
