<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: $100 Citibank e-Savings Bonus: Good News &amp; Bad News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/personal-finance/100-citibank-e-savings-bonus-good-news-bad-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/personal-finance/100-citibank-e-savings-bonus-good-news-bad-news/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:14:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ultimate Savings Account from Citi and $50 Bonus - The Sun&#8217;s Financial Diary - Accumulating wealth is like building The Great Wall, one brick at a time</title>
		<link>http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/personal-finance/100-citibank-e-savings-bonus-good-news-bad-news/comment-page-1/#comment-4167</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ultimate Savings Account from Citi and $50 Bonus - The Sun&#8217;s Financial Diary - Accumulating wealth is like building The Great Wall, one brick at a time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesunsfinancialdiary.com/2007/01/31/100-citibank-e-savings-bonus-good-news-bad-news/#comment-4167</guid>
		<description>[...] first, I thought it was an offer similar to the one I got before for their e-Savings account, but with a lowered rate. Then I realized this actually is different, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first, I thought it was an offer similar to the one I got before for their e-Savings account, but with a lowered rate. Then I realized this actually is different, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.509 seconds -->
