Correct Excess Contribution in Roth IRA Accounts
Post viewed 1750 times, 2 so far today
We realized last weekend after we were done with our income taxes that we, my wife and I, had made excess contributions in our Roth IRA accounts. Based on our income numbers, TurboTax said we were only eligible for $200 Roth IRA contributions in 2006, instead of the maximum $4,000 we made throughout the year. As a result, we will have to withdraw the excess contributions. Among the three options we have, we decided to make the money into a non-deductible traditional IRA as it appears to be the best choice. We can also choose to leave the fund in the account and keep paying 6% tax every year, or get the contributions plus any earnings back in cash, but neither gives us the maximum benefit of tax deferred growth of earnings.
The first step to fix the problem is to choose which fund to unload. For my wife’s account, the choice is quite obvious. She has more than $4,000 in American Century Equite Income Fund (TWEIX), the fund that will soon become a load fund. We never invested in a load fund and will never invest in such a fund, thus it’s an easy decision to sell TWEIX. In fact, I already sold all her TWEIX shares last week and she’s in the process of opening a traditional IRA account and transfer the proceeds to the new account. Part of my wife’s Roth IRA holdings are with Scottrade and the procedure of withdrawing excess Roth contribution at Scottrade is:
- Open a transitional account
- Complete a Roth distribution request
- Remove the excess contribution from the Roth account to the traditional account
As for me, the decision is not easy to make. After transferring most of my IRA assets from Scottrade to Vanguard, I only have one fund (BRSIX) at Scottrade, which has less than $4,000 market value. Besides, BRSIX is also the fund I want to keep. Thus, selling assets in Vanguard account becomes the only choice for me. I currently have four Vanguard funds in my Roth account:
- Vanguard Total International Stock Index (VGTSX)
- Vanguard Inflation-Protected Securities (VIPSX)
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index (VTSMX)
- Vanguard Wellington (VWELX)
Though there are overlaps between VTSMX and VWELX, I really like VWELX a lot and since it now needs a minimum $10,000 (when I got in, it was $3,000), I think I will keep it for now. What I could do is to sell some of VTSMX shares, move the money to the traditional account, and buy VTSMX again. However, with this approach, I will have to pay $10 annual fee since the account will have less than $5,000 in asset by the time I make the withdrawal. To be cost-efficient, I think I will have to go with Vanguard funds (Vanguard charges hefty fees for non-Vanguard products), but which one to invest?
If you enjoyed reading this post, please consider subscribing to my full RSS feed (What's RSS feed?). Or you can also choose to have free daily updates delivered right to your inbox.
Featured Financial Products
- Feeling the pain at the pump? Find out how you can get up to 5% cash back with these gas rewards credit cards. It's the money you have to spend anyway. Why not get some back?
- Ready to buy stocks/ETFs with zero commission? Check out the Zecco review and try Zecco Trading to get 10 free trades/month.
Check Out These Related Articles
- April 2007 Score Card — Part I: Net Worth
- Taxes are Finally Done and Some Thoughts on What to Do Next
- Key Differences between Traditional and Roth IRA
- Six Ways to Boost Your Savings by Making the Most of New Tax Law
- Should We Simplify Our Finance?
5 Comments
Share Your Thouhgts
Your opinion matters. Please use the form below to share your thoughts on Correct Excess Contribution in Roth IRA Accounts with us.Recent Entries
- American Express TrueEarnings Card $25 Bonus
- Unemployment Rate Reaches Five-Year High
- Chinese ADRs Monthly Update - August 2008
- Commodities Make It and Commodities Break It
- HSBC Weekend Card
- August 2008 Score Card — Part I: Net Worth
- Weekend Linkage - September 1, 2008
- More Disturbing Facts on Banks
- Authorized Users Will Be Allowed in FICO Score Calculation
- Reminder: $70 TradeKing Bonus Still Available
- FDIC Problem Banks List Grew to 117 Last Quarter
- DollarSavingsDirect: A High Yield Version of Emigrant Direct
- Financial Tips for College Students
- WTDirect Terminates Promotion After Only Three Days
- Did You Miss These Freebies?
- Google Beijing Olympic Logos: How Google Celebrated the Event
- WaMu Promotion: 5.00% APY for 12-Month Online CD
- WTDirect Promotion: Up to $250 Sign-On Bonus
- American Eagle Gold Coin in Short Supply?
- Boy, Was I Wrong on FRE
- Avoid These Unhealthy Kid Foods
- Suze Orman FICO Kit 20% off Sale
- Poll: Do You Save in 401(k) Without Company Match?
- Weekend Linkage - August 17, 2008
- It’s Not Easy to Live in New Jersey
Loading ...
I’ve nevery really understood this great aversion to fees that so many novice investors have. Isn’t performanance all that really matters?
Talking about IRA.
If I were to make an investment before April 17, is it possible to change the type of investment from 2006 to 2007 after it is already made and marked as 2006?
I had to send two checks for my traditional 2006 IRA in April because I thought the first one got lost. Apparently the mutual fund management received the check so I called the them asking to discard the second check when they receive it. They made a note on the account but I am afraid they may still deposit it.
My bank charges $30 to stop a check payment, so I wouldn’t want to do it. However changing 2006 to 2007 for the second check would be OK. Any thought?
From my experience, I don’t think there’s any problem to make the second check for your 2007 contribution. Usually when you make a contribution before the tax deadline, the fund company may ask you which year the contribution is for because it can go either way. However, whatever contributions you make after the tax deadline can only be for the current year. So if the fund company receives your second check after April 17, there’s no reason for them to assume that it is for 2006. To be sure, you may want to call them later to tell them the second check is for 2007. For them, however, they won’t do anything differently whether it’s for 2006 or 2007. It’s just for your own record-keeping so you know you have already made 2007 contributions.
The Sun: You need to be very careful giving advice in an area where you have no real expertise. It’s not “just for your own record-keeping”, contributions need to be properly coded at the custodian for proper IRS accounting.
thc: Thanks for your comments.
Actually, I never meant to give anybody any advice because I am not a professional and I don’t know enough to give an advice. I can only say from what I know and my own experience, which sometimes is limited. As for this case, when I make IRA contributions before the tax day, I always remember to write on the check which year the contribution is for. If sometimes I forgot, my broker Scottrade would call me for clarification. I don’t know exactly what happens at the custodian, but of course they will have records for the contribution year of the fund, as you said for IRS accounting purpose, and I think that’s why my broker calls me every time when there’s a confusion and that’s also the reason I told Yan to give them a call to make sure everything is right. For me, as a contributor, nothing changes on how the money is invested.
“Just for your own record-keeping” may not be very accurate in this case, but other than that, is there anything else that’s inappropriate or wrong in my answer? If you did notice, please let me know so I can correct it.